CO129-482 - Public Offices - 1923 — Page 10

admissible

Act 19. They

ast howwen for feara

0

extrusion

The

3 дествить

naval

day

doch (which

DISABLED

G

they think adinissith!)

(ii) storage of spare parts foraicraft

(ii) Estäblichement of R.NO.R. (apparently

their crews on this had changed

somewhat since 1760)

14 Dec.

C...D. decided

on above

(1) refer to 70 regal itdiners

(iil no objection

(i) no

objection

decision officially communicated A CO.

in Willis of 30 Dec (172)

12 Jan 70.6 c.10. (1850)

agamist (1). In arguing

7.0. advise against (1).

the case Key say

cr

It was, in the I. of S'o new,

aburags cealised

in the case

at Washington that

of fonts like Hong Kong

which is at the same

and

Ала

time a naval statio

important commercial port, A

was inpossibh to forbid the increase of the commmercial facilities of the port, such as docks, on the ground that the incuand facilities would be available for warshifo

فراد

It is therefore only "navel facilities

dealt with inArt 19"

which are

C.O

Any further communication should be addressed to-

The Secretary of the Admiralty,

2997

RE

London, S.W. 1.

IRE

16

quoting

1.43758/22.

Sir,

8

L.P.--No. 8.

23 JA:

Admiralty, S. W. 1,

16th January,

.192 B

I am commanded by My Lords Commissioners of

the Admiralty to acknowledge receipt of your letter Ca 59046/1922 of the 14th December, forwarding a copy of

a report by Messrs Goode, Fitzmaurice, Wilson and

Mitchell on the subject of harbour development of Hong

Kong, which has been read with interest,

I am to return herewith the copy of the

2.-

Report.

3.-

Adewey

54425/2

I am in this connection to draw attention

to Admiralty Letter M.0255 of 28th October pointing

out that in consequence of the Washington Treaty

His Majesty's Government will not be in a position to

subsidise any works designed for the Harbour development

of Hong Kong.

I am, Sir,

The Under Secretary of State,

Colonial Office.

Your obedient servant,

Marrak